. The 2017 versions of Spine Tango Surgery and Follow-up forms are valid from 1 January 2018. Version 2011 of the Spine Tango Conservative is still valid. Surgery, Follow-up, and patient self-assessment forms can be downloaded here as PDF. Please note that print-outs of pdfs on this website cannot be used for OMR scanning but only for data capture and later online data entry. Copies of retired form versions from 2011 and earlier are available (in English) below.
- Neck Disability Index Form
- Neck Disability Index Spanish Version Pdf
- Oswestry Disability Index Spanish Pdf
Please contact the support team if you require information on retired forms in other languages. The Spine Tango patient self-assessment forms contain the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI), whose items were originally suggested by Deyo et al. 1998 and which was subsequently validated as an outcome instrument in itself by Mannion et al. 2005 and Ferrer et al. 2006, to then become the official outcome instrument of Spine Tango. Please refer to previous publications if you need assistance with the scoring of the COMI (e.g.
Mannion et al. 2015, Spine 40(10):710-718 or Pochon et al. 2015, Eur Spine J DOI 10.1007/s00586-015-4062-3). For users of the registry, scoring is done automatically when you submit your data. Anyone wishing to cross-culturally adapt the COMI in another language should contact the Spine Tango Support (Kelly Goodwin Burri: ) to ensure that a version is not already under development and/or to have the proposed methodology approved. Eurospine Annual Meetings The EUROSPINE meeting website is the platform for all the annual EUROSPINE meetings including the spring speciality meetings. Eurospine Foundation The EUROSPINE Foundation (ESF) is a non-profit, charitable organisation dedicated to the advancement of our knowledge of spinal disorders, improving the standard of care, and the recovery and well-being of patients with back and neck problems.
EUROSPINE PATIENTLINE PATIENTLINE is part of EUROSPINE, whose goal is to provide up-to-date information to patients.
Methods The translation was carried out according to the International Quality of Life Association (IQOLA) Project. Sixty patients were treated due to degenerative and discopathic disorders in the cervical spine filled out the NDI-PL and the CDS-PL. The pain level was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale. The mean age of the assessed group was 47.1 years (SD 8.9). We used Cronbach's alpha to assess internal consistency. We assessed the test-retest reliability using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs). The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rS) was used to determine dependency between quantitative characteristics.
The Mann-Whitney test was applied to determine dependency between quantitative and qualitative characteristics. Results The Cronbach's alpha values were excellent for the NDI-PL in the test and in the retest (0.84, 0.85, respectively), and for the CDS-PL (0.90 in the test and in the retest). Intraclass Correlation Coefficients were excellent for the CDS-PL and NDI-PL and equalled 0.93 (95% CI from 0.89 to 0.95) and 0.87 (95% CI from 0.80 to 0.92), respectively The concurrent validity was good in the test and in the retest (rs = 0.42 p. Conclusions The present versions of the NDI-PL and CDS-PL, the first to be published in Polish, have proven to be reliable and valid for patients with degenerative changes in the cervical spine. The NDI-PL and CDS-PL have excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability, and good concurrent validity. The adapted questionnaires showed a strong inter-correlation both in the test and in the retest. No ceiling or floor effects were detected in the NDI-PL and CDS-PL.
The NDI-PL and CDS-PL are comparable with other versions and can be recommended and used in international comparative studies. Background Annually about 30% of the population experience neck pain (NP), 14% of whom report complaints lasting longer than 6 months ,. Many authors' experiences indicate that subjective assessment of pain intensity and how it influences the extent to which everyday activities are executed is becoming increasingly significant and an important component of clinical practice, however it is vital that, the tools used in the evaluation of the level to which everyday activities are carried out are valid and reliable. There are several questionnaires available measuring NP that have been developed and published in English-speaking countries: Neck Disability Index (NDI) , Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS) , the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPNPQ) , the Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale (CDS). These are classed as region-specific functional outcome questionnaires, which concentrate on specific parts of the body, therefore providing more detailed data on its function within a defined disease entity with greater responsiveness compared to a questionnaire of a general nature such as the Short Form-36 SF-36. SF-36 is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with 36 questions and yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures.
A number of authors ,- highlight the need to adapt recognized and widely applied assessment tools in research rather than developing a new scale leading to the multiplication of outcome measures lacking the comparison of populations. We decided to evaluate the Polish versions of the Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale (CDS-PL) and the Neck Disability Index (NDI-PL). The NDI is the scale most commonly applied, extensively tested and translated. The English version of the NDI has shown moderate differences in reliability and validity with different patient populations. The responsiveness of the NDI is unknown, however concurrent validity when compared with the Visual Analog Scale has been reported. The NDI has been shown to be a valid and reliable instrument to measure disability related to neck pain in studies conducted for French, Brazilian-Portuguese, Iranian, Greek, Finnish, Spanish, Turkish, Korean, Dutch, Chinese, Swedish-speaking patients ,-. The CDS focuses on quality of life and the scores for each item as rated by the patient can be easily transferred and interpreted in terms of their clinical relevance ,.
Despite its many advantages, to our knowledge, the CDS has only been successfully translated and validated into French. The objective of this prospective study was to translate and culturally adapt the NDI and CDS into Polish and to validate their use among Polish-speaking patients with NP. To our knowledge, no questionnaire assessing disability in everyday activities in Polish-speaking patients with neck pain has ever been evaluated and tested for its psychometric properties. Our hypothesis was that if we adapt the NDI and CDS to the Polish cultural conditions and test psychometric properties of the NDI-PL and CDS-PL, such as internal consistency, test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, ceiling or floor effects and analyses of the item-total correlation, then we will achieve assessment tools that are equivalent to the original English- language questionnaires. As a result, we aimed to achieve tools that would help us properly assess pain intensity and the related limitations of cervical spine function during the execution of everyday activities in Polish conditions. Methods The NDI questionnaire was designed by Vernon and Mior in 1992 to assess pain intensity and the related limitations of cervical spine function during the execution of everyday activities. The NDI is based on the Oswestry Disability Index and is composed of 10 questions: pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping, and recreation.
Each item is scored from 0 (no disability) to 5 (total disability). The maximum possible score is 50. However, the sum of the scores obtained is often doubled to give a percentage score out of 100.
The interpretation is as follows: 0-20 normal, 21-40 mild disability, 41-60 moderate, 61-80 severe and 80 or over (complete or exaggerated disability). Since the questionnaire is straightforward, the average patient needs approximately 5 minutes to complete it ,. The CDS consists of 15 items that evaluate the impact of neck pain. Three items evaluate pain severity directly, including the patient's perception of the future impact of neck pain, eight items evaluate disability during everyday activities and four items focus on social interaction and recreation ,. There are three possible answers to select from each item; 'yes' (2 points), 'occasionally' (1 point), and 'no' (0 points).
For items 1 - 5 however the scoring is reversed and here 'yes' carries a score of 0, 'occasionally' 1 and 'no' 2. The highest score attainable is 30, indicating worst possible impact, the lowest is 0 where no impact of neck pain can be identified.
90 seconds is invariably sufficient in order to complete the questionnaire. Translation procedure The translation was carried out in accordance with the recommendations proposed by Beaton et al.
In the first stage two independent translators, of whom one had a medical background, translated the original versions of the NDI and CDS into Polish. In the second stage, a team comprised of the project authors and both translators compared and synthesised the translations. In the third phase, two bilingual translators performed the back-translation where the Polish versions of the questionnaires were translated into the original language. In the fourth stage, the expert committee reviewed all translations and created a prefinal version of the questionnaires. In order to evaluate the psychometric properties of the questionnaire, 60 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the study completed the NDI-PL, CDS-PL and 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale twice. (See additional file: Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability ScalePolish version and additional file: Neck Disability IndexPolish version).
Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the NDI-PL and CDS-PL 1. We analyzed means, minimal and maximal values, standard deviations and 95% confidence intervals for the general results, for the CDS-PL dimensions and for the NDI-PL questions. We analyzed floor and ceiling effects (% of patients with the minimal score and% of patients with the maximum score). Ceiling and floor effects are considered to be present if more than 15% of respondents achieved the lowest or highest possible total score. We used Cronbach's alpha to assess internal consistency. Additionally, we performed analyses of the item-total correlation for the NDI-PL and CDS-PL.
We analyzed the correlations between the NDI-PL and CDS-PL. We performed an assessment of the test-retest reliability using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs), type 2.1. The NDI-PL and CDS-PL were completed twice at a 24-hour interval. For construct-related validity, the concurrent validity method was used. To examine the concurrent validity, the relation between the NDI-PL and CDS-PL and 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale was examined by the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Statistica program. In the quality field we supplied the number of units for specific categories of a given characteristic and their relative percentage values.
The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rS) was used to determine dependency between quantitative characteristics. The Mann-Whitney test was applied to determine dependency between quantitative and qualitative characteristics. The borderline value of statistical significance was set at p = 0.05.
Test results with a greater value than this were deemed to be statistically irrelevant. Cronbach's alpha values were accepted as follows: ≥0.80 as excellent, 0.70-0.79 as adequate and. Participants Patients eligible for the study were consecutively recruited from June 2009 to September 2010. Eligibility criteria were the following: written consent of the patient, neck pain lasting more than 3 months; ability to read and speak Polish fluently; age 18-60 years.
MRI of cervical segments of the spine was carried out in all cases. The analysis did not include pregnant woman and patients suffering from spinal tumors, vertebral traumatic fractures, neurological and psychiatric disorders causing difficulty in speech communications. All physical examinations were performed by the same physician, a neurosurgeon.
All patients were operated on due to discopathy and vertebral degenerative changes in the cervical spine. Surgery was carried out via anterior vertebral approach and consisted of the decompression of the spinal cord and subsequent arthrodesis. Clinical state was determined before surgery in our study. All examined persons were guaranteed anonymity and written consent was required. Demographic variables and the previous history of disease were taken from all of the patients.
Disability was evaluated with the NDI-PL and the CDS-PL. The pain level was evaluated using 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale. Table summarizes the demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients.
Floor and ceiling effect We have analyzed floor and ceiling effects for the general results of the CDS-PL and NDI-PL. In the case of CDS-PL, in both the test and retest, 3.3% of patients received the minimum score (2 participants), and the 1.7% of patients received the maximum score (1 participant). Patients with the minimum and maximum score were not identified in the test nor in the retest of the general result of the NDI-PL. Both in the CDS-PL and NDI-PL floor or ceiling effects were not detected as less than 15% achieved the minimum or maximum possible scores.
Internal consistency Table presents the Cronbach's alpha values, concurrent validity in the test and in the retest and test-retest reliability measured by the Pearson correlation coefficient. The Cronbach's alpha values are excellent for the NDI-PL in the test (0.84) and in the retest (0.85). Cronbach's alpha values for the CDS-PL are excellent, and equalled 0.90 in the test and in the retest (Table ). Moreover, the analyses of item-total correlation confirmed that both scales are internally consistent (Table and Table ). Questions of CDS Test Retest rs p value rs p value 1. Can you sleep at night without neck pain interfering?
The correlation between selected patient clinical characteristics and the results of the NDI-PL and CDS-PL We have also assessed the correlation between selected patient clinical characteristics and the results of the adapted assessment tools. The only statistically significant correlations were identified between CDS-PL and changes in signal intensity in spinal cord in MRI (p = 0.29) and between NDI-PL and changes in signal intensity in spinal cord in MRI (p = 0.44) and the sagittal dimension of the vertebral canal on the discopathy level (p = 0.23), in the first completion of the questionnaires (Table ). The present results confirmed our hypothesis. We have proved that the NDI-PL and CDS-PL have excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability, good concurrent validity and showed a strong inter-correlation both in the test and in the retest.
Moreover, no ceiling or floor effects were detected in the NDI-PL and CDS-PL. Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first study of a Polish version of a questionnaire assessing disability in everyday activities in patients with neck pain. Even though there are several region-specific functional outcome questionnaires measuring neck disorders available, no Polish version has ever been validated. Our study indicated that NDI-PL and CDS-PL are valid and reliable methods for measuring disability in Polish patients with neck pain. There have been numerous studies on the reliability and validity of the Neck Disability Index for patients with neck pain ,.
Vernon and Mior obtained a high degree of test-retest reliability in patients with post-traumatic neck pain, using the Pearson correlation coefficient. The internal consistency of each questionnaire was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. We also assessed the item-total correlations.
Our study indicated that NDI-PL and CDS-PL are internally consistent. In comparison to the French version of CDS , where all items had good or fair correlations with the total score, almost all items of CDS-PL had very good correlations with the general result. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the total score of CDS-PL was excellent and higher, compared to the French version of CDS.
However, the Cronbach's alpha in our study was exactly the same as in the original version of the CDS (0.90). Excellent internal consistency of the NDI-PL (0.90) is comparable with the results from other studies - Spanish, Finnish, Iranian or Brazilian versions of NDI ,. It is higher than the value obtained by Vernon and Mior (0.8) in the original NDI.
Pearson correlation coefficients between individual NDI-PL item scores and the total ranged from 0.43 to 0.77 (test) and from 0.56 to 0.81 (retest) and, as in the original version of the NDI , no item dominated with an especially high correlation and no item appeared to be redundant. We assessed the test-retest reliability of NDI-PL and CNFDS-PL using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs). We decided to choose a retest interval of 2 days, similarly to the authors of the Spanish or Iranian version of NDI, in order to avoid variations in the clinical status of the patients and to avoid the patients remembering their previous answers.
As suggested by Holt et al. , a long interval period may be inappropriate for a test-retest study of health measures because too many changes in the patient's health status can occur. Opinions regarding the appropriate interval have varied from 1 hour to 1 year, but a retest interval of 2 to 14 days is generally accepted. The very good test-retest reliability of NDI-PL is comparable with the results of the Iranian (0.90) and Greek (0.93) versions of the NDI ,.
Our findings are also similar to the original version of NDI (0.90). Furthermore, the NDI-PL test-retest reliability values were found to be slightly higher than those achieved during the initial trials for the original version when study participants completed the questionnaires with an interval of 2 days between the first and second test as occurred in our study (0.80). For the NDI-PL and CDS-PL the expected good concurrent validity was observed. As in the Spanish version of the NDI, a good correlation with the VAS score is evident, which may signify, as highlighted by Andrade et al , that the NDI is designed to assess not pain levels as such but rather disability due to pain experienced. The results of our study showed that the correlation between NDI-PL and CDS-PL is very high, showing a clear association between these two measures, which seem to measure similar constructs. What is more, our examinations proved that the degree of spinal cord compression and spinal cord ischemic changes, expressed as changes of MRI signal intensity, correlate with the disability scales NDI-PL and CDS-PL. Intervertebral cervical disc herniation and degenerative changes are associated with narrowing of the sagital diameter of the spinal canal.
Progressive compression may lead to spinal cord ischemia, leading to histopathological changes of the spinal cord. Nonetheless, these changes may or may not be symptomatic ,.
Limitations Our population was limited to patients with degenerative and discopathic disorders in the cervical spine, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other populations. Fifteen (25%) of the patients participating in our study omitted the section concerned with driving (section 8). This is consistent with both the Dutch and Turkish versions of the NDI, where 21% and 23.87% of participants did not answer this section ,.
It was not necessary to modify this section as the number of patients who omitted it was low. The study evaluating the Greek version of the NDI recorded that 44.6% of patients decided not to answer the questions on 'driving'. Future research Despite the fact that we confirmed that both adapted assessment tools have excellent internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and good concurrent validity, further investigation is required to provide additional data for the evaluation of the psychometric properties of the NDI-PL and CDS-PL. In future studies responsiveness, which is a useful property required for determining if the measures are sensitive to detect changes over time, should be tested. Likewise, the item-level analyses of the NDI-PL and CDS-PL would be helpful in future research to provide a more detailed analysis of the functioning of the items for the population.
Conclusion Our study presents an analysis of the psychometric properties of two region-specific functional disability scales for patients with degenerative changes in the cervical spine. As far as we know, this article describes the first attempt at translation and validation of questionnaires appropriate for Polish-speaking patients with neck pain. We have indicated, that the present versions of the NDI-PL and CDS-PL, the first to be published in Polish, have proven to be reliable and valid. The NDI-PL and CDS-PL have excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability, and good concurrent validity. The adapted questionnaires showed a strong inter-correlation both in the test and in the retest.
No ceiling or floor effects were detected in the NDI-PL and CDS-PL. The NDI-PL and CDS-PL are comparable with other versions and can be recommended and used in international comparative studies.
Disability adjusted life years DALYs for 2. Global Burden of Disease Study 2. Measuring disease and injury burden in populations requires a composite metric that captures both premature mortality and the prevalence and severity of ill health. 0 Global Burden of Disease study proposed adjusted life years DALYs to measure disease burden. No comprehensive update of disease burden worldwide incorporating a systematic reassessment of disease and injury specific epidemiology has been done since the 1. We aimed to calculate disease burden worldwide and for 2.
We DALYs as the sum of years of life lost YLLs and years lived with disability YLDs. DALYs were calculated for 2. YLLs were calculated from age sex country time specific estimates of mortality by cause, with death by standardised lost life expectancy at each age. YLDs were calculated as prevalence of 1. Neither YLLs nor YLDs were age weighted or discounted. Uncertainty around cause specific DALYs was calculated incorporating uncertainty in levels of all cause mortality, cause specific mortality, prevalence, and disability weights.
BibMe Free Bibliography Citation Maker MLA, APA, Chicago, Harvard. Multiple sclerosis can cause a variety of symptoms changes in sensation hypoesthesia, muscle weakness, abnormal muscle spasms, or difficulty moving difficulties.
Dec 25, 2017 - 1.zip hosted on mediafire.com 45.15 MB, Lil' Wayne - Tha Carter 3. Download Album Lil Wayne - The Carter III (Target Deluxe Edition) (2008). How Tha Carter III came to be 'the most anticipated rap album of 2008' is a story that involves the usual delays and promises of a masterpiece, plus a whole lot. Got Money (ft. T-Pain) (Produced By Play-N-Skillz). Download; Queue; Save Remove from Library; Add to Playlist; View Song; Share Song. Comfortable (ft.
Oct 23, 2017 - Lil Wayne Tha Carter Iii Download Zip. Com Lil wayne tha carter 2004 zip uploaded. Lil Wayne - Free Weezy Album.7z. Lil Wayne - Tha Carter. Check out Lil Wayne's full Free Discography at MixtapeMonkey.com. New Orleans, LA Hip-Hop/Rap 352,143 Downloads. Dedication 3 - Lil Wayne. Dedication 3. The Carter Files. 2006 Hip-Hop, Rap. Prefix - Lil Wayne.
Hanvon tablet Social Media Shoppers. Enrich your life by digital. Active working area maps computer screen automatically by adjustment on driver configuration interface. Hanvon rollick 0604 driver windows 8. Hanvon Rollick RL0604 Digital Graphic. Customer Reviews Hanvon 8x6 Graphic Tablet Pen with.
Get detailed information about gallbladder cancer from the American Cancer Society. PCFSN engages, educates, and empowers all Americans to adopt a healthy lifestyle that includes regular physical activity and good nutrition. Since 1956, the Council. WebMD experts and contributors provide answers to your health questions. RESEARCH Open Access Spanish version of SPADI shoulder pain and disability index in musculoskeletal shoulder pain a new 10items version after confirmatory factor.
Global DALYs remained stable from 1. Crude DALYs per 1. An important shift has occurred in DALY composition with the contribution of deaths and disability among children younger than 5 years of age declining from 4. YLLs typically account for about half of disease burden in more developed regions high income Asia Pacific, western Europe, high income North America, and Australasia, rising to over 8.
DALYs in sub Saharan Africa. Crosscultural adaptation of the Neck Disability Index and Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale for patients with neck pain due to degenerative and discopathic.
Includes news releases, state statistics, surveillance, and brochures. 7 of DALYs worldwide were from communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional disorders, 4.
0, this had shifted to 3. Ischaemic heart disease was the leading cause of DALYs worldwide in 2. DALYs, stroke fifth in 1. Major depressive disorder increased from 1. Substantial heterogeneity exists in rankings of leading causes of disease burden among regions. Global disease burden has continued to shift away from communicable to non communicable diseases and from premature death to years lived with disability. In sub Saharan Africa, however, many communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional disorders remain the dominant causes of disease burden.
The rising burden from mental and behavioural disorders, musculoskeletal disorders, and diabetes will impose new challenges on health systems. Regional heterogeneity highlights the importance of understanding local burden of disease and setting goals and targets for the post 2. Because of improved definitions, methods, and data, these results for 1. Global Burden of Disease results. Bill Melinda Gates Foundation.
Neck Disability Index Form
Rehab Measures Oswestry Disability Index. Artus, M., van der Windt, D.
Low back pain symptoms show a similar pattern of improvement following a wide range of primary care treatments a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Rheumatology Oxford 4. Find it on Pub. Y., Glassman, S. Predicting SF 6.
D utility scores from the Oswestry disability index and numeric rating scales for back and leg pain. Spine Phila Pa 1. Find it on Pub. K., Bridwell, K. Major complications in revision adult deformity surgery risk factors and clinical outcomes with 2 to 7 year follow up. Spine Phila Pa 1. Find it on Pub.
G., Glassman, S. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 3.
Spine J 86 9. Find it on Pub. Med Dawson, A. P., Steele, E. Utility of the Oswestry Disability Index for studies of back pain related disability in nurses evaluation of psychometric and measurement properties. Int J Nurs Stud 4. Find it on Pub.
Use of Oswestry Disability Index ODI. Spine Phila Pa 1.
Find it on Pub. Use and abuse of Oswestry Disability Index. Spine Phila Pa 1. Find it on Pub. And Pynsent, P. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine Phila Pa 1.
Find it on Pub. Frost, H., Lamb, S. Responsiveness of a patient specific outcome measure compared with the Oswestry Disability Index v. Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire for patients with subacute and chronic low back pain. Spine Phila Pa 1. Find it on Pub.
Glassman, S., Gornet, M. MOS short form 3. Oswestry Disability Index outcomes in lumbar fusion a multicenter experience. Spine J 61 2.
Neck Disability Index Spanish Version Pdf
Find it on Pub. Grotle, M., Garratt, A. Reliability and construct validity of self report questionnaires for patients with pelvic girdle pain. Find it on Pub.
Haro, H., Maekawa, S., et al. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Spine J 82 3. Find it on Pub. Horvath, G., Koroknai, G., et al. Prevalence of low back pain and lumbar spine degenerative disorders. Questionnaire survey and clinical radiological analysis of a representative Hungarian population. Int Orthop 3. Find it on Pub.
Jenks, K., Meikle, G., et al. Osteitis ilii a significant association with sacroiliac joint tenderness in women. Int J Rheum Dis 1. Find it on Pub. Med Johnsen, L. G., Hellum, C., et al.
Comparison of the SF6. D, and the oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc disease. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 1. Find it on Pub. And Gehrchen, M. Transpedicular closed wedge osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis results of surgical treatment and prospective outcome analysis.
Eur Spine J 1. Find it on Pub. The use of the percentage change in Oswestry Disability Index score as an outcome measure in lumbar spinal surgery. Spine Phila Pa 1. Find it on Pub.
Miekisiak, G., Kollataj, M., et al. Validation and cross cultural adaptation of the Polish version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Spine Phila Pa 1. Find it on Pub.
Med Monticone, M., Baiardi, P., et al. Responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire in Italian subjects with sub acute and chronic low back pain. European Spine Journal 2. Find it on Pub. Psychometric properties and clinical usefulness of the Oswestry Disability Index.
J Chiropr Med 74 1. Find it on Pub. Med Wittink, H., Turk, D. Comparison of the redundancy, reliability, and responsiveness to change among SF 3.
Oswestry Disability Index Spanish Pdf
Oswestry Disability Index, and Multidimensional Pain Inventory. Clin J Pain 2. Find it on Pub.